![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOZB_D07vanbuhxy-qfP8QPuacurnBgpcUcCfaNvfJCRhGvOo1cFEgWH2oTSwLdf-Bkrfq6mQnBCCRQxzrSwEqqePlBOzafQaWAn5Rwh8milQjTIsqOqQ7JyKL4r19gz_NukkmUYL3L93a/s320/spam.gif)
On Friday,
Cool Green Science, the conservation blog for the Nature Conservancy, pointed to a
piece on Scientific American's
60 Second Science blog that touted a McAfee study which concluded that spam emails cause recipients to waste tons of electricity sorting through the junk.
PC Magazine disagrees. The New York Times says
spam accounts for 94% of all email, so I'm not sure PC Magazine is living in the same world as I am. All I know is that dealing with spam may not run up my electric bill to any noticeable extent, but it wears me out.
0 comments:
Post a Comment